FANDOM

A FANDOM user
  Loading editor
  • Hello! I would just like to inform you there's currently a discussion being held over the future structure of character articles regarding the recent announcements of comics, books, and a video game. You can participate in the discussion here.

    Hope to see your input! Thank you.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, I would like to request your permission to adopt this wiki. The wiki really needs more admins, moderators, etc but with the wiki's only bureaucrat being inactive, there is no way for that to happen. Here is the adoption form I submitted.

    Thank you!

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello, I was wondering if it would be ok to make some changes to the character infoboxes? For example, changing 'Marital status' to 'Relationship status' and possibly adding other info rows? 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • can you lock mike wheeler's page bc it keeps get vandalized 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hello,

    Could you point the attention of contributors to the Manual of Style talk page? (I know you have powers, I've seen it before haha.) Me and Highspeednerd have made some suggestions, and would like to involve more contributors so everyone can get a say and maybe reach consensus.

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Hey man,

    So there's this wiseguy who vandalised Steve and Jonathan's pages. Nothing too serious, but if you want you can check what they did for yourself. Anyway, I "undid" all of their edits, so they're no longer on the Wiki. However, you might want to ban them.

    http://strangerthings.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Contributions/86.185.1.242

    There you go.

      Loading editor
    • View all 8 replies
    • As of now, only logged-in contributors can edit articles on the site.

        Loading editor
    • Cool. Hopefully that will fix things up a little bit.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • Is this true? Cause' I quite doubt it

    https://gyazo.com/c299962a2ebd2e6383f75233abf1de83

      Loading editor
  • Hi, thanks for making this wiki.

    It seems like editors are writing the entire history/biography of characters in the 'Background' section, rather than just their background. For this reason I think it would make more sense for the 'Background' sections to be renamed as 'Biography' or 'History'. Other wikias do this, eg Tardis Wikia, Wookiepedia. In my opinion 'Background' would make more sense as a sub-heading within History/Biography sections.

    Would be interested to hear what you think about my suggestion. 

      Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
  • So i watched the first episode and it seemed alright but kinda slow. Do the epiusodes get better? I really like the nostalgic vibe to it!

      Loading editor
  • Could we use something à la Lostpedia's episode references on STW? Instead of placing the episode in a footnote, they use their Crossref template to place the reference in the text, written in small text and paranthesis, like this: ("The Weirdo on Maple Street")

    See "Jacob" (or any Lostpedia article) for examples.

    I think it looks better and makes the reference more accessible to the reader. It's very simple to use when editing, and might encourage more editors to reference the episodes as well.

      Loading editor
    • I added the crossref template here a while ago, and added it to the Eleven page. However, it was removed by FishTank. I didn't care enough to ask why, but you should check with him before you change anything.

        Loading editor
    • Lostpedia's code is a bit older, and doesn't really represent some of the modern metrics about how people read articles. Usability testing shows that people actually don't like the inline references, because they find them intrusive and jarring away from the main thrust of the narrative. Part of it also has to do with the styling on mobile, where such links are not significantly different than the body text. They also tend to get confused with grammatically correct text. Such links and styling are handled more responsively on different platforms when they're made with the standard <ref> tags. So, respectfully, accessibility to the reader does not necessarily bear out. 

      For a middle-ground solution, we might consider reference groups. These are in action on Eleven. They use <ref group="Episodes" name="S01E01">[[The Vanishing of Will Byers]]</ref> and <references group="Episodes" /> and clearly identify that you're referencing a particular episode, but not which one without an additional click / tap. We could standardize or style this somewhat as well (such as making the footnote "Episode: 'The Vanishing of Will Byers'" ). Or, we could consider ReferencePopups (though I would prefer we wouldn't).

        Loading editor
    • Okay, that all makes sense. Thank you again, FishTank, for such a comprehensive explanation! My reasoning for suggesting this basically boils down to "it looks cool and it's easy to spot," so it's no biggie to me.

      As for the reference groups, I personally think they could be a little confusing. "Episodes 1" seems like it refers to the first episode, while in reality it just refers to the first reference in that group, right? Unless there was some way to make them correspond to the episode number (and season now that #2 is coming), I think sticking to the regular references is preferrable.

        Loading editor
    • A FANDOM user
        Loading editor
Give Kudos to this message
You've given this message Kudos!
See who gave Kudos to this message