Hello administrator, I'm new to this wiki. I would like to know about the history of the page, which the staff makes in their charge. Finally I am interested in knowing about the process to make a content for this page.
I'm sorry, I'm afraid I don't understand. Are you referring to the staff page? If so, that page has been protected so only admins and moderators can edit it. I suppose I can let you edit it, though it depends on what type of edit you wish to make.
A bit off topic, sorry, but any favorite 80's songs? I personally have WAY too many to name, but here are a few: "Shiny Shiny" by Haysi Fantayzee, "Rain in May" by Max Werner, and "Kayleigh" by Marillion. I love how Stranger Things includes 80's songs often.
Don't worry, it's fine!. Yeah, I've got some faves, though I'm afraid they're all sort of "mainstream". For example, "Africa" by Toto, "Holding Out for a Hero" by Bonnie Tyler, "You Spin Me Round" by Dead Or Alive, "The Riddle" by Nik Kershaw, and one of my absolute faves, "Take Me Home Tonight" by Eddie Money (I'm hoping this one is used sometime in the series, but since it came out in November 1986, it would be lucky if it somehow made it into the 4th season). Yeah, they really help set the tone of the show.
Hi, I've changed the image of the template of season 2, episode 4: Will, the Wise, to something that focuses on Will as that's the name of the episode. Should I keep it or revert it back....
I don't know why I even did that, though part of the reason was the synopsis was about Will and Hopper and Eleven and the image of Jonathan and Nancy caught up in Hawkins Lab was a bit distracting and of low resolution..
Another question-How can I revert back the images that I'd uploaded to its previous state? I mean, yesterday, I was trying to rename the image (bvecause if I wanted to add like Will's image but type Will in the search box of gallery, I couldn't find due to those images being named such-HTTPS AV......,MV07645....., Screenshot08-65.....etc) and as soon as I did that, the pages/articles that had the image were left in blank/white. I tried to revert the names of the image back to the previous state but it said I couldn't. So, I had to manually edit and remove the images from the articles and then reupload them to the respective pages. While I solved the problem, I thought that reverting would have been less time-consuming and easier, wouldn't you say?
The reason the images went blank was because when you rename an image, if it is linked to on an article, the link will still say the image's old name. For example, if you rename an image with the file name "Will Byers" to just "Will", then any links in articles will still say "Will Byers". However, if you choose to leave a redirect, the old file name will link to the new name, and so the images will still appear normally.
Weird that it didn't let you revert the images back. Are you sure you got the image extensions correct? When renaming a file, you have to use the same extension type.
Ok, I think I might know what the problem is. Did you try adding the image as soon as the editor opened? When I tried adding the image immediately after I opened the editor, the image wasn't added. However, when I clicked on a place in the article, it worked fine. So, I guess try clicking on the place in the article you want the image added first. If it still doesn't work, it may be a bug and you may have to contact FANDOM staff. You can also try adding the image manually by typing [[File:Image-name]] in the article.
Hi, oh, I found the solution. It seems that if I add images that have names with apostophes like- Byer's house, Will's return etc, then it doesn't let you add photos when you click "Add this photo". But removing the apostophes solves it....
"Hopper cabin" is named that way because it's referring to the Hopper family (Hopper, Eleven, Hopper's grandfather), not just Hopper himself. It's also supposed to mirror how the house pages are named. I do agree about renaming "Awards" to "Awards and nominations", though.
Sorry for not editing too much this past couple of days. I may be quite busy upto Early-May due to some on-going courses that I'm participating. But will be back soon to adding and editing contents since production might also begin by that time my course is finished.
The reason why I haven't updated it is because I was planning on instead using the rail extension for something else. I never really figured out what, but shortly after the release of season two, one of the other admins created a Discord for the wiki, and I was thinking about placing it in the module's place.
Could you please help me on something? I'm trying to figure out how to rename a wikia so I could avoid copyright infringement from another site by the same name. Do you know how I can solve this problem?
Hi there :D ! I just wanted to ask you a quick question regarding Jonathan and Nancy’s relationship status on their articles: can we classify them as boyfriend and girlfriend yet? I was just wondering because we don’t really have confirmation that they carried on romantically with each other after their night together. Please correct me if I’m wrong. If you agree, I would like to request that their relationship status be changed from “boyfriend/girlfriend” to “fling” or something to that effect. I believe we just don’t know was of yet if they carried on a steady relationship.
Hello! While it is true it has not been explicitly stated that they are in a relationship, there are some subtle hints we can use to come to that conclusion. The first being, Steve and Nancy appear to no longer be in a relationship, as implied by the sad, wistful look he gave her when he took Dustin to the dance. Second, since we're on the subject of looks, there was the look they shared at the Snow Ball. The look was pretty much an extremely subtle way to show the audience they are now together. I'll admit, this would be grasping at straws, had a big part of their arcs not centered on their relationship. It can also be argued that they are at the dance "together", though this is tentative, since they appear to be chaperones for their siblings/volunteers at the dance.
Yeah, I'd prefer if it was 100% confirmed, but we have to take into account that with a show like this we will not always be spoonfed information. Sometimes, implication is all we're going to get. A good example is with the Demodogs being young Demogorgons. It was heavily implied in the show, but because we didn't actually see one turn into a Demogorgon, many people believed they were actually different species until it was confirmed by the VFX crew. Through this, we can infer that if something is implied to be true, it is most likely true. Of course, this also depends on the situation.
I will fully admit, since it hasn't been fully confirmed, there is a possibility that they aren't in a relationship. However, considering it was always the Duffers' plan to have Nancy and Jonathan enter a relationship (Steve was originally supposed to be a HUGE JERK, but the Duffers changed his character because of Joe Keery's performance), along with the aforementioned implications, I think it's a safe bet to say that they are. If they aren't, it can always be changed. Looks like we'll have to wait until season 3 to know for sure.
Yes, his actions were nefarious, but they were done because he did not trust her, not because he wanted to deliberately stop her from reaching her goals or anything like that. If from that point on, he had still shown desire to kill or harm her, than yes, he would've been considered an antagonist.
Hi, Good Day! I am a Communication student and I am doing a research about the influence of Stranger Thing's Pop Culture influence our current pop culture. I have included your article for our research and to make the formal citation I wanted to request for your real name and the other admin. Thank you
Hello! I'm glad that you are including one of the wiki's articles for your research! Answering your question about who mainly wrote it, the article is pretty much an amalgamation of several users' efforts. The article itself was created by a user named FishTank, and looking through the page's history , many edits appeared to have been from users 80XPD and TheGreatGabester. You can try leaving messages on their walls if you like, but TheGreatGabester is currently inactive on the wiki (though you still may get a response).
To be honest, I haven't written as much for the article as the users I've just listed have, so I'm not sure if I should really be included. I would give you my real name, but unfortunately this site isn't the best for these kinds of things, since all activity appears in the activity feed and can be seen by anyone. If you are willing to arrange another way for me to contact you, I'll gladly do it.
Hi 008, hope you're good,
I regret to say that I will be unable to make any edits for the foreseeable future. Other commitments in my life mean I have to maximise the use of my time for now, and unfortunately, that means cutting out time working on the wiki. I may do the occasional minor edit, and I may possibly return to proper editing duties. But for now, I'm afraid I won't be around. Sorry this is so short notice. If it turns out that I cannot return to work on the wiki, I would like to thank you for being a great collaborator, and I hope the best for the wiki going forward.
I'm sad to see you go, but I completely understand. I wish you luck in all your current and future endeavors. You too, were a great person to work with (and an excellent writer!). I hope you'll be able to return, but if you can't, I understand. Thanks for all your great work and help with the wiki, I wish you the best.
Just replace the old template with the new one over on its template page. All instances of the template will then be updated to the new one. If you still see the old template on pages once you've replaced it, don't worry. Sometimes it takes time for the templates to update. You can also force the template to update by editing the page.